Real review history
Pull requests with human review comments show how professional engineers reason about code. That history is the most valued part of a repository.
For software founders, CTOs and owners
Private repositories with real review history are the asset AI training buyers want most. Potential value only, subject to individual appraisal and agreed rights.
Leave your name and email and we’ll get in touch. You can tell us about your project next, if you like.
Your enquiry is already saved.
Your enquiry is saved. We’ll follow up using the contact details you shared.

A little bird, a good conversation
Goodwattle’s AI helper · The humans follow up by email
Your chat is saved with your enquiry and emailed to Pasha, Pennie and Andrew. OpenAI helps Wattle reply. Please leave out passwords, personal data and confidential code. Wattle can explain things; a person reviews any offer.
You’re all done. If you have a moment, you can also tell us a little about your project. Nothing is sold or licensed by enquiring.
Goodwattle buys and licenses company-owned codebases and supplies them, verified and scoped, to the vendors that build training data and evaluation environments for AI labs. Your product can keep running: a non-exclusive licence leaves ownership with you.

Why buyers want company code
What AI training buyers are short of is private, professional engineering with its history intact.
Pull requests with human review comments show how professional engineers reason about code. That history is the most valued part of a repository.
Code that has never been published or licensed for AI use is new to buyers. We ask about both early.
Tests, linked tickets and design documents make a codebase easier to turn into training tasks and evaluation environments.
What we look for
This is the screen buyers currently apply to private repositories. Missing an item doesn’t rule you out; it tells us what to ask about.
Please leave out credentials, customer data and confidential code for now. A non-confidential overview is enough.
What it could pay
Substantial company codebases that meet the screen can be worth A$60,000 or more. Smaller or partial codebases can range from A$200 to A$10,000. Value depends on size, review depth, quality, rights and what buyers need at the time. Every codebase is appraised individually; some will not be a fit, and offers can be lower.
Before anything changes hands
We check ownership, public-code overlap, licences, secrets and personal information before anything is offered. See how we verify.
We supply vendors that build coding datasets, software-engineering benchmarks and reinforcement-learning environments for AI labs. See what buyers receive.
Scope, permitted uses, exclusivity and payment are agreed in a written contract before handover. Nothing is sold or licensed by sending an enquiry.
Try it yourself
Browser-only and illustrative. Nothing is stored or sent unless you choose to.
An illustrative band for your codebase and the three things that would move it most.
Open the codebase value estimatorA local script that measures your repository and never uploads your code.
Open the repository provenance checkA little look. A clear next step.
Leave your name, email and an optional phone number. We save your enquiry straight away; project details and a small sample can follow if you like.
A real person reviews your overview. We discuss the opportunity and arrange confidentiality before a detailed review.
If there’s a fit, we put the scope, rights, intended uses and payment in writing. You decide whether to proceed.
A purchase can transfer agreed rights. A licence can let you keep ownership while permitting specific uses, including AI research, training or evaluation. We can discuss a fixed payment, revenue share or ongoing arrangement where suitable. Nothing is sold or licensed by sending an enquiry.
A LITTLE CLARITY
Your work. Your next chapter.
Let’s make the possibilities clear.

Smaller projects can range from A$200 to A$10,000. Substantial company-owned codebases can be worth A$60,000 or more. Value depends on complexity, quality, contents, rights and fit. Every project is evaluated individually; these figures are possibilities, not guaranteed offers.
No. A$60,000 or more is a possibility for suitable substantial company codebases. Every codebase is reviewed individually; offers may be lower and some codebases will not be a fit.
Yes. A non-exclusive licence lets your company keep owning, shipping and selling the software while permitting agreed AI training or evaluation uses. An outright purchase is also possible and is scoped separately.
No. The conversation is about selected code and development materials. A codebase purchase or licence is separate from a sale of your company, customer data or operating business.
Start with a non-confidential description. We agree confidentiality and a review process before any detailed handover. Do not submit credentials, customer data or code you cannot share.
Typically it becomes training examples, evaluation tasks or reinforcement-learning environments for coding models. Permitted uses are listed in the contract, with any limits on publication or redistribution.
Let’s see what’s possible
Start with a few details. We’ll come back with an honest view of the fit.
Appraise our codebaseA friendly appraisal. No obligation to accept an offer.