For SWE data, benchmark and RL environment teams
Private repositories with the review history intact.
Never-public, company-owned codebases with real pull-request review, delivered with a provenance manifest and a written licence.
The screen
Screened against your brief.
The screen above reflects what buyers have asked for so far. If your brief needs a different bar, such as particular languages, a higher reviewed-PR minimum, test coverage or ticket linkage, tell us and we screen against yours.
Supply comes from Australian and New Zealand software companies, including companies winding down. Most of these repositories have never been offered to anyone.
Every delivery
Manifest fields.
| Field | What it records |
|---|---|
| Language mix | Share of original source lines by language. |
| Lines of code | Original source, excluding vendored, generated and third-party code. |
| Reviewed PR count | Merged pull requests or changelists with at least one human review. |
| History span | First and last commit dates, with gaps and rewritten history flagged. |
| Contributor count | Distinct human authors after merging duplicate identities. |
| Test ratio | Test files and lines relative to source. |
| Licence scan result | SPDX identifiers, licence headers and vendored code found, with exclusions listed. |
| PII scan result | Secrets and personal identifiers found and removed or replaced, with counts. |
| Provenance attestations | Ownership chain, never-public and no-prior-AI-licensing statements from the owner. |
Sample
An anonymised manifest.
{
"asset_id": "GW-REPO-EXAMPLE",
"illustrative": true,
"owner_type": "Australian private company",
"language_mix": {
"TypeScript": 0.58,
"Python": 0.27,
"SQL": 0.09,
"other": 0.06
},
"loc_original": 412000,
"reviewed_pr_count": 1840,
"history_span": {
"first_commit": "2017-03",
"last_commit": "2025-11",
"gaps_flagged": 0
},
"contributors": 23,
"test_ratio": 0.31,
"licence_scan": {
"spdx_found": [
"MIT",
"Apache-2.0"
],
"vendored_files_excluded": 214,
"copyleft_in_original_code": false
},
"pii_scan": {
"secrets_removed": 7,
"emails_replaced": 1260,
"phone_numbers_replaced": 18
},
"provenance": {
"never_public": "attested",
"prior_ai_licensing": "none, attested",
"ip_assignment": "employment and contractor agreements reviewed"
},
"ai_generated_share": "under 5%, disclosed"
}Commercial terms
Exclusivity options.
| Option | What it means |
|---|---|
| Non-exclusive | The asset may also be licensed to other buyers. The lowest price and the fastest to agree. |
| Exclusive by use | Exclusive for an agreed use, such as training or evaluation, for an agreed term. |
| Fully exclusive | One buyer for the agreed term. The owner can usually keep operating their own product. |
| First look | A window to review and accept an asset before it is offered to anyone else. |
Request a brief
Tell us what you need.
Asset class, minimums, exclusivity and budget. We reply with what we can supply against it, and how soon. A brief commits you to nothing.
Prefer email? hello@goodwattle.com